You can find a lot more information about animals here. Good zoos in which animals are well fed and well looked after in spacious surroundings are becoming the norm and should be encouraged. For example, animals such as giraffes and zebras were designed, and are built, to run across miles of terrain, something they cannot do in captivity.
Also not being able to climb, hunt and run will make the animals obese. As there is a better alternative to zoos why do we have them.
While all conservation efforts must be admired, for those people against keeping animals in a zoo it is all a pointless exercise. This is understandable because even though the park has given the elephants massive amounts of green space to themselves, in the wild they are used to hundreds and hundreds of miles that become their domain.
Is keeping animals in captivity a good way to ensure their future. People who have their own small zoo like to think of their animals as pets.
They are inevitably confined in unnaturally small spaces, and are kept from the public by cages and bars. One of the most valuable benefits a zoo has to offer is the chance for scientists to conduct important research. Most people working in zoos are true animal lovers.
People visiting zoos will be given the subliminal message that it is OK to use animals for our own ends. Also, if the person who owns the zoo becomes ill or is unable to look after the animals, what happens to them.
Cant be hunted and cant be killed off with deforestation. How can a tiger hunt its prey in a zoo. Sometimes kids get hurt or are killed. I have studied zoology from childhood and have visited many zoos in my lifetime.
Do you think zoos are necessary. If you read an essay on conservation it may help explain what it means. They are not forcing the animals into any ridiculous side shows involving party tricks and silly costumes.
Should there be zoos. In the past, representatives from the zoo would simply capture the desired animal from the wild and bring it back.
There are certainly problems with trying to conserve endangered species in this way but it is right that we should at least try to conserve them. An increasing number of species are on the verge extinction, and sometimes the only way to ensure their survival is to institute captive breeding programs.
Both sorts of study are valuable and, as in point 4, there is no reason why this should not be done in the context of a cruelty-free zoo as well as in other contexts.
Whereas in the past, staffs were trained in general zoo upkeep, zookeepers now have specialist knowledge and often specialise in a particular animal. For example, the elephant is accustomed to live in tropical climates but is forced to live in zoos in cold countries like Canada.
Their focus on that day was on keeping out of the sun by lying under shady trees and Izmir zoo is very much backing the stance that if you do not get to see an animal then you should return at a different time.
Many other animals in zoos live in very small spaces compared to the space that they have in the wild. It is neither fair nor proportionate. The new wildlife park focuses on large amounts of space for the animals as well as top quality care and attention to their needs. Another problem is privacy, because the animals are living in habitats that are often extremely smaller than they are used to, the animal cannot enjoy much needed privacy.
As a form of education the zoo is deficient: Kids can learn about animals at zoos. This means that we are more likely to regard animals as creatures to entertain us. See the efforts in New Zealand to have the national bird, the Kiwi, living wild in some protected areas and uninhabited islands, both of which have been largely successful.
Ever since there has been an increasing public concern about animal welfare in zoos. I have a reasonable amount of insight on the issue, enough to give my input and the opinions I passionately stand by.
However the truth is there are many zoos around the world that are both a touristic and local attraction.
Often they like to keep large animals like tigers and lions. From an ethical point of view zoos are also questionable. Zoos help raising awareness and funding for wildlife initiatives and research projects.
Zoos keep animals safe. Zoos are a place where animals are protected. They cannot be killed by people, or killed by predators.
Animals should be kept in zoos, because they provide educational help for kids to learn about animals, without the risk of injury to themselves or the animals. Arguments For and Against Zoos. Search the site GO. Issues. Animal Rights Animals in Entertainment Surplus animals are sold not only to other zoos, but also to circuses, canned hunting facilities, At least one study has shown that elephants kept in zoos do not live as long as elephants in the wild.
Write a debating speech on the topic “Animals should never be kept in zoos”. You can either choose for or against the motion.
You can either choose for or against the motion. Honorable adjudicators, Ladies and gentlemen, Today’s motion is “ Animals should never be kept in zoos ”. Should animals be kept in zoos? Why or why not?
More Resources. Video: DNews i believe that animals should not be in zoos any more because it is like a jail for humans. However, there are some.
Should Animals be Kept in Zoos? – The Cons. Larger species can feel confined about the lack of space; It enforces the belief that animals do not have rights; There is the chance that some Zoos will not place the animal’s well-being before profit.
Some species do not adapt as well to captivity as other species. ANIMALS SHOULD NOT BE KEPT IN ZOOS FOR ENTERTAINMENT. Putting an animal in a zoo is like locking someone up in prison for something they did not do.Animals should not be kept in zoos