Kristi doshs argument on why college athletes should not be paid

Put it all together and it looks like this: A college sports strike might seem implausible. This process results in the following cost estimates, which will be saved if an athlete goes elsewhere: Given the APR scores of other teams, this is clearly a feat.

If the university were a tax-exempt entity, it could issue the bonds, or be the beneficiary of an issue, and build athletic facilities. There, the end would justify the means. This is one example of how schools all make their Hollywood blockbusters look like money losers.

Thirteen dollars an hour instead of eleven. The entire enterprise depends on it, the way heroin junkies depend on smack and the American economy depends on oil.

The NCAA has no real reasoning behind why student athletes should not be getting paid for the services they provide to their schools.

December Music of the Month

As mentioned in the article, these athletes are spending around 50 to 60 hours a week with the team. NCAA's system of amateurism isn't worthy of our cheers. Not only would donors no longer be receiving a tax deduction for their donation, an important reason for donations, but they could be paying for the pleasure of donating to the university, because their donation could now be considered a gift.

As basketball grows in popularity in African schools and as basketball clubs are formed in the same way that soccer clubs were formed in African cities 50 to 60 years ago you can be sure that many talented basketball players will develop. The alternative is the current system, and the true problem with college sports as we know them isn't that athletes are denied compensation -- it's that they are denied basic rights.

If no profits were taken, then the NCAA would have an argument against paying players, but they do take profits, a lot of profits. Because no one asks. They relied on administrators to act in their best interest. The Outlook for Reform. Other donations for which nothing is received in return would be subject to the gift tax, payable by the donor.

College athletes should not be paid. The only type of method a college athlete should be paid in is through their education. As a result, these athletes have a choice of a good education. Jun 15,  · Great Article not sure if College Athletes will ever be employees But if they were the SEC/BIG would pay the most in taxes and the $$ Gap would surely close a bit.

Should College Athletes Be Paid?

The real cost, however, is in the athletic department losing its tax exemption under Internal Revenue Code Section ©(3). This graphic also supports my argument of why college athletes should not be paid.

One of my main reasons is due to the financial aspect of this idea. As seen above, only a portion of college athletic departments would really be able to pay their athletes.

should double-down on the concept of "student" in the student-athlete model. In particular, this paper suggests that adopting a more realistic approach to educating athletes will benefit both the universities and student-athletes, relieving pressure on the current model and improving educational outcomes.

Reading: Why Those Student Loans Are Still Worth It, Elaine Pofeldt Understanding More about Opinions Identifying Illogical Support Emotional Appeals Fallacies in Reasoning Reading: Time to Treat College Athletes Fairly, Leigh Steinberg Reading: The Problems with Paying College Athletes, Kristi Dosh Writing with Facts, Inferences, Opinions, and Price: $ College athletes do not deserve to be paid because the point of college is to get an education, not a “camp” before the pros.

It has been statistically proven that out of all the Division 1 sports teams, only 45% of them are actually allowed to graduate.

Kristi doshs argument on why college athletes should not be paid
Rated 5/5 based on 76 review
Eastern Michigan ain’t saving money by cutting | Sportsgeekonomics